Two days ago, I saw news posted that a teacher of a university in Bangkok forced one of his female students to do oral sex for him so that this student can get a high grade for his subject. And right now this teacher has been arrested for his obscenity or immoral conduct. For this news, it is a quite strange relationship between a teacher and his female student. This event happens without love. But there is an interesting point about the relationship between a teacher and a female student, but with love.
In Thailand, it is well known that the relationship involve with romance between a teacher and a female student is not acceptable, no matter a school teacher or a university professor. Teachers are expected not to make a passionate commitment with their students. But in reality, love can happen to every person with every occupation. And love can happen to a teacher and a student as well. For this point, it is unacceptable. Why?
In my opinion, I don’t think that a teacher and a student cannot love each other. It is their rights to do. But in Thailand the teacher who commits such commitment is not acceptable and is blamed for his immoral commitment by members of society. Is it fair for him? Is it just because only one word “Teacher” that prohibits him and his girl to do such commitment? I don’t think they should be blamed. Love can be occurred between them if they do the right things that are considered not to break morality. Why does just only this occupation have to be blamed? How about other occupation?
In Thailand, it is well known that the relationship involve with romance between a teacher and a female student is not acceptable, no matter a school teacher or a university professor. Teachers are expected not to make a passionate commitment with their students. But in reality, love can happen to every person with every occupation. And love can happen to a teacher and a student as well. For this point, it is unacceptable. Why?
In my opinion, I don’t think that a teacher and a student cannot love each other. It is their rights to do. But in Thailand the teacher who commits such commitment is not acceptable and is blamed for his immoral commitment by members of society. Is it fair for him? Is it just because only one word “Teacher” that prohibits him and his girl to do such commitment? I don’t think they should be blamed. Love can be occurred between them if they do the right things that are considered not to break morality. Why does just only this occupation have to be blamed? How about other occupation?
It is right saying that teachers are models of their students. But are those teachers human being? Yes, they are human being. They can feel love as much as the others do. Right? The problem is how they deal with this feeling. Someone said that a teacher should not have a passionate with his student. But are those teachers wrong? And if that is a real love between a teacher and his student, does he have to quit his occupation just because he is a teacher? Is that a reasonable reason? How about other people in other occupation? Why aren’t they blamed? What happen to those teachers?
Why do they have to be limited their rights just because of only one word “teacher”?
In your opinion, do you think love between a teacher and a student can be formed up? Is it suitable? Do you have any idea about it?
Why do they have to be limited their rights just because of only one word “teacher”?
In your opinion, do you think love between a teacher and a student can be formed up? Is it suitable? Do you have any idea about it?
Posted by Photchana